GeForce2 MX vs Radeon RX 6900 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking361600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation30.39no data
Power efficiency16.35no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNavi 21NV11 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120no data
Core clock speed1825 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Wattno data
Texture fill rate720.00.7
Floating-point processing power23.04 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1282
TMUs3204
Ray Tracing Cores80no data
L0 Cache1.3 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mmno data
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C1x VGA
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)7.0
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6900 XT 26728
+1336300%
Samples: 7188
GeForce2 MX 2
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD196no data
1440p134no data
4K83no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.10no data
1440p7.46no data
4K12.04no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 195 no data
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 no data
Escape from Tarkov 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 190−200 no data
Fortnite 300−350 no data
Forza Horizon 4 283 no data
Forza Horizon 5 190−200 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 350−400 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 196 no data
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 no data
Dota 2 160−170 no data
Escape from Tarkov 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 190−200 no data
Fortnite 300−350 no data
Forza Horizon 4 279 no data
Forza Horizon 5 190−200 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170 no data
Metro Exodus 164 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 323 no data
Valorant 350−400 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 197 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 160−170 no data
Dota 2 160−170 no data
Escape from Tarkov 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 190−200 no data
Forza Horizon 4 248 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164 no data
Valorant 411 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 190−200 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140 no data
Metro Exodus 102 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 400−450 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 196 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95 no data
Escape from Tarkov 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 160−170 no data
Forza Horizon 4 231 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 150−160 no data
Metro Exodus 67 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 122 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 134 no data
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Dota 2 150−160 no data
Escape from Tarkov 80−85 no data
Far Cry 5 100−110 no data
Forza Horizon 4 162 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2020 28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 180 nm

RX 6900 XT has an age advantage of 20 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 XT and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4263 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6900 XT or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.