GeForce GT 320 OEM vs Radeon RX 6900 XT

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking18not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation21.21no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 21GT215
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 December 2020 (3 years ago)2 February 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data
Current price$957 (1x MSRP)no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512072
Core clock speed1825 MHz540 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate720.012.96
Floating-point performanceno data187.49 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm175 mm
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz1580 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s25.28 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI++

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDAno data1.2

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 8 December 2020 2 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 43 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6900 XT and GeForce GT 320 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
GeForce GT 320 OEM

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3396 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 56 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.