T400 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6800M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking149not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.47no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 22TU117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560896
Core clock speed2116 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2390 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate382.479.80
Floating-point processing power12.24 TFLOPS2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16056
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 18 Watt

RX 6800M has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T400 Mobile, on the other hand, has 705.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6800M and T400 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M
NVIDIA T400 Mobile
T400 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 311 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate T400 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.