Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics vs RX 6800
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 64 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 44.26 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 16.04 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | Navi 21 | Beema |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 October 2020 (4 years ago) | 23 February 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $579 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 1700 MHz | 497 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2105 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 26,800 million | 930 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 505.2 | 3.976 |
| Floating-point processing power | 16.17 TFLOPS | 0.06362 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 96 | 4 |
| TMUs | 240 | 8 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | IGP |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 (6.0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2.170 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 28 October 2020 | 23 February 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 15 Watt |
RX 6800 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
R1E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 1566.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6800 and Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 6800 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R1E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
