Matrox Millennium G400 vs Radeon RX 6800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking42not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation51.51no data
Power efficiency15.93no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameNavi 21Toucan
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 October 2020 (4 years ago)20 May 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$579 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840no data
Core clock speed1700 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed2105 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate505.20.25
Floating-point processing power16.17 TFLOPSno data
ROPs962
TMUs2402
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm150 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x DVI, 1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL2.1None
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2020 20 May 1999
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 250 nm

RX 6800 has an age advantage of 21 year, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6800 and Matrox Millennium G400. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800
Matrox Millennium G400
Millennium G400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1828 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Matrox Millennium G400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.