STG-2000 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking42not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.63no data
Power efficiency15.30no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)no data
GPU code nameNavi 21NV1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)30 September 1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4608no data
Core clock speed1825 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHzno data
Number of transistors26,800 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate648.00.08
Floating-point processing power20.74 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1281
TMUs2881
Ray Tracing Cores72no data
L0 Cache1.1 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6FPM
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s400.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)1.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 October 2020 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 2 Watt

RX 6800 XT has an age advantage of 25 years, a 1638300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 7042.9% more advanced lithography process.

STG-2000, on the other hand, has 14900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6800 XT and STG-2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT
NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4343 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 87 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6800 XT or STG-2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.