GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Radeon RX 6800 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6800 XT with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RX 6800 XT
2020, $649
16 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
60.25

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms 6800 XT by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.65no data
Power efficiency15.5641.89
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21AD103
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 October 2020 (5 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46089728
Core clock speed1825 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speed2250 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate648.0515.3
Floating-point processing power20.74 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs128112
TMUs288304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Cores7276
L0 Cache1.1 MBno data
L1 Cache1 MB9.5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB64 MB
L3 Cache128 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6800 XT 60.25
RTX 4090 Mobile 64.88
+7.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6800 XT 25099
Samples: 8028
RTX 4090 Mobile 27030
+7.7%
Samples: 3303

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6800 XT 52046
RTX 4090 Mobile 64746
+24.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6800 XT 96516
RTX 4090 Mobile 113387
+17.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6800 XT 49735
+7.7%
RTX 4090 Mobile 46191

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6800 XT 193053
+34.8%
RTX 4090 Mobile 143162

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6800 XT 504438
RTX 4090 Mobile 554375
+9.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD195
+16.8%
167
1440p138
+9.5%
126
4K92
+19.5%
77

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.33no data
1440p4.70no data
4K7.05no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 180−190 211
+11.6%
Counter-Strike 2 290−300 300−350
+4%
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+2.7%
147
Resident Evil 4 Remake 180−190 218
+19.1%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 180−190
+8.6%
174
Battlefield 5 191
+9.1%
170−180
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+24.6%
240
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+6.3%
142
Far Cry 5 143 173
+21%
Fortnite 280−290 300−350
+6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 250−260
+9.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400
+9.4%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 180−190
+13.2%
167
Battlefield 5 183
+4.6%
170−180
Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+39.7%
214
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+13.5%
133
Dota 2 166 199
+19.9%
Far Cry 5 139 167
+20.1%
Fortnite 280−290 300−350
+6.3%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 250−260
+9.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 150 162
+8%
Metro Exodus 152 156
+2.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 294 394
+34%
Valorant 350−400 350−400
+9.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 175 170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160
+18%
128
Dota 2 145 187
+29%
Far Cry 5 130 158
+21.5%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 250−260
+9.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160 204
+27.5%
Valorant 356 350−400
+7.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290 300−350
+6.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+4.6%
173
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500 516
+11.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 120 138
+15%
Metro Exodus 95 117
+23.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 400−450 485
+17.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 154 160−170
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 95
+13.1%
Far Cry 5 131 151
+15.3%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 220−230
+11%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150 164
+14.7%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Atomic Heart 50−55 60−65
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 88
+8.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 134 172
+28.4%
Metro Exodus 56 82
+46.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110 150
+36.4%
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 103 120−130
+17.5%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 90−95
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 48
+20%
Dota 2 122 179
+46.7%
Far Cry 5 95 107
+12.6%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 170−180
+16%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

4K
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 314 314

This is how RX 6800 XT and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT is 17% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 XT is 10% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 XT is 19% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 40% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4090 Mobile is 47% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6800 XT performs better in 11 tests (17%)
  • RTX 4090 Mobile performs better in 41 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (17%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 60.25 64.88
Recency 28 October 2020 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 120 Watt

RTX 4090 Mobile has a 8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6800 XT and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4700 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 919 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6800 XT or GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.