Radeon R7 350 Fake Card vs RX 6700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking51not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.01no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 22Opal
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 March 2021 (3 years ago)2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$479 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560384
Core clock speed2321 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed2581 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,200 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate413.025.20
Floating-point processing power13.21 gflopsno data
ROPs648
TMUs16024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz4.6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s36.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x VGA
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.56.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1 (1.2)
Vulkan1.21.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 35 Watt

RX 6700 XT has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350 Fake Card, on the other hand, has 557.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6700 XT and Radeon R7 350 Fake Card. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT
AMD Radeon R7 350 Fake Card
Radeon R7 350 Fake Card

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 6331 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 Fake Card on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.