Apple M5 Max 32-Core GPU vs Radeon RX 6700 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83104
Place by popularity73not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.41no data
Power efficiency15.80no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)no data
GPU code nameNavi 22no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 March 2021 (5 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$479 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256032
Core clock speed2321 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2581 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)230 Wattno data
Texture fill rate413.0no data
Floating-point processing power13.21 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data
L0 Cache640 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data
L3 Cache96 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD144no data
1440p78no data
4K46no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.33no data
1440p6.14no data
4K10.41no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 349 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 119 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 257 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 140−150 no data
Counter-Strike 2 347 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 99 no data
Far Cry 5 178 no data
Fortnite 200−210 no data
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 no data
Forza Horizon 5 224 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 260−270 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 140−150 no data
Counter-Strike 2 206 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 90 no data
Dota 2 175 no data
Far Cry 5 169 no data
Fortnite 200−210 no data
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 no data
Forza Horizon 5 200 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 161 no data
Metro Exodus 119 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223 no data
Valorant 260−270 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 85 no data
Dota 2 139 no data
Far Cry 5 159 no data
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127 no data
Valorant 260−270 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 126 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 102 no data
Metro Exodus 71 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 290−300 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 56 no data
Far Cry 5 137 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 32 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 102 no data
Metro Exodus 43 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 no data
Valorant 280−290 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 no data
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 25 no data
Dota 2 106 no data
Far Cry 5 71 no data
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 no data

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6700 XT and M5 Max 32-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop graphics card while Apple M5 Max 32-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 8646 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate M5 Max 32-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6700 XT or M5 Max 32-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.