Arc A550M vs Radeon RX 6650M XT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6650M XT and Arc A550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 6650M XT outperforms Arc A550M by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 83 | 227 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 25.46 | 28.16 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | Navi 23 | DG2-512 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) | 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 2068 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2416 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 11,060 million | 21,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 309.2 | 262.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 9.896 TFLOPS | 8.397 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 256 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+113%
|
45−50
−113%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+94%
|
50−55
−94%
|
| Elden Ring | 150−160
+98.8%
|
80−85
−98.8%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+48%
|
75−80
−48%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+113%
|
45−50
−113%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+94%
|
50−55
−94%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 220−230
+107%
|
100−110
−107%
|
| Metro Exodus | 100−110
+60.9%
|
60−65
−60.9%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85−90
+57.4%
|
50−55
−57.4%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+81.8%
|
95−100
−81.8%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+48%
|
75−80
−48%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+113%
|
45−50
−113%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+94%
|
50−55
−94%
|
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+56.5%
|
85−90
−56.5%
|
| Elden Ring | 150−160
+98.8%
|
80−85
−98.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+35.5%
|
75−80
−35.5%
|
| Fortnite | 180−190
+50.8%
|
120−130
−50.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 220−230
+107%
|
100−110
−107%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 130−140
+58.3%
|
80−85
−58.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 100−110
+60.9%
|
60−65
−60.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 200−210
+34.8%
|
150−160
−34.8%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85−90
+57.4%
|
50−55
−57.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 160−170
+105%
|
75−80
−105%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+81.8%
|
95−100
−81.8%
|
| World of Tanks | 270−280
+9%
|
250−260
−9%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 110−120
+48%
|
75−80
−48%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 95−100
+113%
|
45−50
−113%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 95−100
+94%
|
50−55
−94%
|
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+56.5%
|
85−90
−56.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+35.5%
|
75−80
−35.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 220−230
+107%
|
100−110
−107%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 200−210
+34.8%
|
150−160
−34.8%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+81.8%
|
95−100
−81.8%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Dota 2 | 80−85
+105%
|
40−45
−105%
|
| Elden Ring | 95−100
+121%
|
40−45
−121%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 80−85
+105%
|
40−45
−105%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 45−50
+100%
|
21−24
−100%
|
| World of Tanks | 280−290
+72.4%
|
160−170
−72.4%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+59.2%
|
45−50
−59.2%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+124%
|
21−24
−124%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50
+129%
|
21−24
−129%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 140−150
+101%
|
70−75
−101%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+103%
|
65−70
−103%
|
| Metro Exodus | 90−95
+66.1%
|
55−60
−66.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 80−85
+125%
|
35−40
−125%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+123%
|
65−70
−123%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+118%
|
21−24
−118%
|
| Dota 2 | 90−95
+112%
|
40−45
−112%
|
| Elden Ring | 45−50
+142%
|
18−20
−142%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 90−95
+112%
|
40−45
−112%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+100%
|
18−20
−100%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 140−150
+96%
|
75−80
−96%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−33
+100%
|
14−16
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 90−95
+117%
|
40−45
−117%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+104%
|
24−27
−104%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+118%
|
21−24
−118%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+163%
|
8−9
−163%
|
| Dota 2 | 90−95
+112%
|
40−45
−112%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+116%
|
30−35
−116%
|
| Fortnite | 65−70
+120%
|
30−33
−120%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+97.4%
|
35−40
−97.4%
|
| Valorant | 75−80
+147%
|
30−35
−147%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 163% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 6650M XT is ahead in 62 tests (98%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (2%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 44.39 | 24.55 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 60 Watt |
RX 6650M XT has a 80.8% higher aggregate performance score.
Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
