Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics vs RX 6650 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking112not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.66no data
Power efficiency17.91no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNavi 23Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 May 2022 (3 years ago)6 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048128
Core clock speed2055 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2635 MHz847 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)176 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate337.36.400
Floating-point processing power10.79 TFLOPS0.2048 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1288
Ray Tracing Cores32no data
L0 Cache512 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2190 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth280.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2022 6 June 2014
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 176 Watt 15 Watt

RX 6650 XT has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

R5E Mobile Graphics, on the other hand, has 1073% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6650 XT and Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 4127 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6650 XT or Radeon R5E Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.