Radeon PRO W9070 vs RX 6650 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking113not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.80no data
Power efficiency18.07no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNavi 23Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 May 2022 (4 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484096
Core clock speed2055 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed2635 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)176 Watt304 Watt
Texture fill rate337.3760.3
Floating-point processing power10.79 TFLOPS48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs128256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Cores3264
L0 Cache512 KB1 MB
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB8 MB
L3 Cache32 MB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2190 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth280.3 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 176 Watt 304 Watt

RX 6650 XT has 73% lower power consumption.

PRO W9070, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6650 XT and Radeon PRO W9070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W9070 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 4213 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W9070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6650 XT or Radeon PRO W9070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.