Arc A380 vs Radeon RX 6600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6600 XT and Arc A380, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 6600 XT
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
42.70
+43.6%

RX 6600 XT outperforms Arc A380 by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking78174
Place by popularity91not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.5014.18
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 23DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 July 2021 (2 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 $149
Current price$283 (0.7x MSRP)$591 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 242% better value for money than Arc A380.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed1968 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed2589 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 (TGP) Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate331.4131.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length190 mm222 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6600 XT 42.70
+43.6%
Arc A380 29.74

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Arc A380 by 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6600 XT 16488
+164%
Arc A380 6238

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Arc A380 by 164% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6600 XT 39051
+181%
Arc A380 13892

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Arc A380 by 181% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6600 XT 88163
+63.3%
Arc A380 53979

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Arc A380 by 63% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6600 XT 28342
+179%
Arc A380 10174

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Arc A380 by 179% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6600 XT 156297
+157%
Arc A380 60804

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Arc A380 by 157% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX 6600 XT 472371
+1.2%
Arc A380 466666

Radeon RX 6600 XT outperforms Arc A380 by 1% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
+184%
45
−184%
1440p75
+50%
50−55
−50%
4K41
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+39.2%
79
−39.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+39.3%
61
−39.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+40%
50
−40%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+34%
95−100
−34%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+39.3%
60−65
−39.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 110−120
+41%
78
−41%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+41.8%
65−70
−41.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−105
+31.6%
75−80
−31.6%
Forza Horizon 4 100−105
+31.6%
76
−31.6%
Hitman 3 85−90
+39.3%
60−65
−39.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
+38.6%
101
−38.6%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+39.8%
90−95
−39.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+42.9%
75−80
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+38.3%
94
−38.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+36.4%
55
−36.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+40%
50
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+35.1%
37
−35.1%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+34%
95−100
−34%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+39.3%
60−65
−39.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−105
+31.6%
76
−31.6%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+41.8%
65−70
−41.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−105
+31.6%
75−80
−31.6%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+38.2%
120−130
−38.2%
Hitman 3 85−90
+39.3%
60−65
−39.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+35.6%
110−120
−35.6%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+33.3%
30
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+42.9%
75−80
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+37.5%
80
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+36.4%
66
−36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+37.5%
80−85
−37.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+37.9%
29
−37.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+29%
31
−29%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+39.3%
60−65
−39.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+37.7%
69
−37.7%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+41.8%
65−70
−41.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+40.4%
57
−40.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+34.6%
52
−34.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+39.3%
61
−39.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+32.4%
34
−32.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+40%
25
−40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+42.9%
75−80
−42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+42.9%
55−60
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+36.4%
65−70
−36.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+29%
30−35
−29%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+42.9%
40−45
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+37.5%
40
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+34.6%
50−55
−34.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
Hitman 3 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+37.1%
60−65
−37.1%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+40.4%
55−60
−40.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+39.7%
65−70
−39.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+41%
35−40
−41%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+40%
50−55
−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Hitman 3 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+28.6%
14
−28.6%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%

This is how RX 6600 XT and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 184% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 50% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 52% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.70 29.74
Recency 30 July 2021 14 June 2022
Cost $379 $149
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3863 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 740 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.