Iris Xe Graphics 80EU vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking216not rated
Place by popularity84not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.33no data
Power efficiency16.10no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 24Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024640
Core clock speed2610 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2815 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)107 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate180.252.00
Floating-point processing power5.765 TFLOPS1.664 TFLOPS
ROPs3220
TMUs6440
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4Ring Bus
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2248 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth143.9 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.23.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 107 Watt 45 Watt

RX 6500 XT has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, on the other hand, has 137.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6500 XT and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3214 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 150 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.