Apple M4 8-core GPU vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking218not rated
Place by popularity82not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.60no data
Power efficiency16.00no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameNavi 24no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10248
Core clock speed2610 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2815 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)107 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate180.2no data
Floating-point processing power5.765 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5X-7500
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2248 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth143.9 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 6 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 107 Watt 4 Watt

Apple M4 8-core GPU has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 2575% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 6500 XT and Apple M4 8-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop card while Apple M4 8-core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Apple M4 8-core GPU
M4 8-core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3298 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 8-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.