ATI All-In-Wonder X600 PRO vs Radeon RX 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking667not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.15no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code namePolaris 23RV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 May 2019 (6 years ago)1 July 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1082 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1218 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate48.721.600
Floating-point processing power1.559 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs404
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth48 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2019 1 July 2005
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 110 nm

RX 640 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 640 and All-In-Wonder X600 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 640 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X600 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 283 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 640 or All-In-Wonder X600 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.