UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Radeon RX 5950

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated714
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.70
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 21Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data15 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores486448
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed1535 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors21,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate466.6no data
Floating-point processing power14.93 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs304no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed14000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12_1
OpenGL4.6no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 28 Watt

RX 5950 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5950 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5950 is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5950
Radeon RX 5950
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 541 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5950 or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.