ATI Radeon X1300 CE vs RX 5950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 21RV505
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data27 October 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4864no data
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed1535 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,000 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate466.61.400
Floating-point processing power14.93 TFLOPSno data
ROPs964
TMUs3044

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 27 Watt

RX 5950 has a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1300 CE, on the other hand, has 1196.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5950 and Radeon X1300 CE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5950
Radeon RX 5950
ATI Radeon X1300 CE
Radeon X1300 CE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1300 CE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5950 or Radeon X1300 CE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.