Matrox Mystique G200 vs Radeon RX 5950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2023)G200 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameNavi 21Eclipse
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data1998 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4864no data
Core clock speedno data84 MHz
Boost clock speed1535 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,000 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Wattno data
Texture fill rate466.60.08
Floating-point performance14.93 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 2x
Lengthno data150 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz112 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s896.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)5.0
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCLno dataNone
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 350 nm

RX 5950 has a 307100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5950 and Matrox Mystique G200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5950
Radeon RX 5950
Matrox Mystique G200
Mystique G200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 11 votes

Rate Matrox Mystique G200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.