GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs Radeon RX 5950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 21TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data25 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4864896
Core clock speedno data1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1535 MHz1275 MHz
Number of transistors21,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate466.671.40
Floating-point processing power14.93 TFLOPS2.285 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs30456
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 31 Watt

RX 5950 has a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

MX450 30.5W 8Gbps, on the other hand, has 1029% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5950 and GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5950 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5950
Radeon RX 5950
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 12 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5950 or GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.