GeForce 8400 SE vs Radeon RX 5950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1482
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.25
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNavi 21G86S
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data1 August 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores486416
Core clock speedno data459 MHz
Boost clock speed1535 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,000 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate466.63.672
Floating-point processing power14.93 TFLOPS0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs964
TMUs3048
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 50 Watt

RX 5950 has a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1043% more advanced lithography process.

8400 SE, on the other hand, has 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5950 and GeForce 8400 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 11 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5950 or GeForce 8400 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.