H800 SXM5 vs Radeon RX 5900

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Hopper (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 21GH100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409616896
Core clock speedno data1095 MHz
Boost clock speed1635 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistors21,000 million80,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt700 Watt
Texture fill rate418.6926.6
Floating-point processing power13.39 TFLOPS59.3 TFLOPS
ROPs9624
TMUs256528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM3
Maximum RAM amount12 GB80 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s1,681 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 700 Watt

RX 5900 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

H800 SXM5, on the other hand, has a 566.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5900 and H800 SXM5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5900 is a desktop card while H800 SXM5 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5900
Radeon RX 5900
NVIDIA H800 SXM5
H800 SXM5

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate H800 SXM5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.