ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p vs Radeon RX 5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 21R300
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096no data
Core clock speedno data324 MHz
Boost clock speed1635 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,000 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate418.62.592
Floating-point processing power13.39 TFLOPSno data
ROPs968
TMUs2568

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP Pro 8x
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz276 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s17.66 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 37 Watt

RX 5900 has a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p, on the other hand, has 710.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5900 and FireGL 9700 X1-256p. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5900 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL 9700 X1-256p is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5900
Radeon RX 5900
ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256p
FireGL 9700 X1-256p

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL 9700 X1-256p on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5900 or FireGL 9700 X1-256p, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.