RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon RX 5800

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated92
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.58
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30724608
Boost clock speed1735 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate333.1no data
Floating-point processing power10.66 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs192no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate
OpenGL4.6no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 139.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5800 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5800 is a desktop card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5800
Radeon RX 5800
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 111 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 9 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.