Jetson TK1 vs Radeon RX 5800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameNavi 23GK20A
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)15 October 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072192
Core clock speedno data756 MHz
Boost clock speed1735 MHz951 MHz
Manufacturing process technology7 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)275 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate333.17.608
Floating-point processing power10.66 TFLOPS0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1928

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x1
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz467 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s7.472 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.6ES 3.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-3.2

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 275 Watt 8 Watt

RX 5800 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson TK1, on the other hand, has 3337.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5800 and Jetson TK1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5800 is a desktop card while Jetson TK1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5800
Radeon RX 5800
NVIDIA Jetson TK1
Jetson TK1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 111 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson TK1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.