GeForce GTX 260 216 Rev. 2 vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 338 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.16 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 13.94 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 20 | GT200B |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 April 2017 (8 years ago) | 27 November 2008 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $301.69 | $299 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 216 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1077 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 5,700 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 171 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 155.1 | 41.47 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.963 TFLOPS | 0.5365 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 28 |
| TMUs | 144 | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 224 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 896 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 448 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 999 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 111.9 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 April 2017 | 27 November 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 896 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 171 Watt |
RX 580 Mobile has an age advantage of 8 years, a 814.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 71% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 580 Mobile and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 580 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
