Trace: try redirect_from

Trace: select _id, title from ss_cards where redirect_to=2074

Trace: try redirect_from

Trace: select _id, title from ss_cards where redirect_to=5061

GeForce GT 740 vs Radeon RX 580 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 580 Mobile with GeForce GT 740, including specs and performance data.

RX 580 Mobile
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
20.63
+437%

RX 580 Mobile outperforms GT 740 by a whopping 437% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking254673
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.880.19
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePolarisGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)29 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$301.69 $89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580 Mobile has 16679% better value for money than GT 740.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304384
Core clock speed1000 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speed1077 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt64 Watt
Texture fill rate155.131.78
Floating-point performance4.963 gflops0.7626 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s80.19 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580 Mobile 20.63
+437%
GT 740 3.84

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 580 Mobile 11261
+477%
GT 740 1950

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
+450%
14−16
−450%
4K30
+500%
5−6
−500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+500%
21−24
−500%
Hitman 3 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+450%
18−20
−450%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+492%
12−14
−492%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+481%
16−18
−481%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+500%
21−24
−500%
Hitman 3 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+450%
18−20
−450%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+492%
12−14
−492%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+481%
16−18
−481%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+475%
8−9
−475%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+500%
8−9
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+500%
21−24
−500%
Hitman 3 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+450%
18−20
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+517%
6−7
−517%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
+481%
16−18
−481%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+457%
7−8
−457%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+520%
5−6
−520%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+448%
21−24
−448%
Hitman 3 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+476%
21−24
−476%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+467%
6−7
−467%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Hitman 3 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+494%
18−20
−494%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+500%
4−5
−500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%

This is how RX 580 Mobile and GT 740 compete in popular games:

  • RX 580 Mobile is 450% faster in 1080p
  • RX 580 Mobile is 500% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.63 3.84
Recency 18 April 2017 29 May 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 64 Watt

RX 580 Mobile has a 437.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

GT 740, on the other hand, has 56.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 580 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 740 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GT 740 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580 Mobile
Radeon RX 580 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GeForce GT 740

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 28 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1121 vote

Rate GeForce GT 740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.