ATI FireGL V7300 vs Radeon RX 580 XTR

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code namePolaris 20R520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $1,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1257 MHz594 MHz
Boost clock speed1340 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)185 Watt97 Watt
Texture fill rate193.09.504
ROPs3216
TMUs14416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz648 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s41.47 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2017 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 185 Watt 97 Watt

RX 580 XTR has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL V7300, on the other hand, has 90.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 580 XTR and FireGL V7300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 580 XTR is a desktop card while FireGL V7300 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 580 XTR
Radeon RX 580 XTR
ATI FireGL V7300
FireGL V7300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX 580 XTR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.