Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs Radeon RX 5770
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 914 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 24.20 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | no data |
| GPU code name | Navi 10 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 6 December 2018 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 7 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 7 Watt |
Qualcomm Adreno 685 has 3114% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5770 and Qualcomm Adreno 685. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 5770 is a desktop graphics card while Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
