RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 5700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Next RX 5600 OEM RX 5600 XT RX 5700 RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary RX 5770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
L4 2000 Ada Generation 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 4000 Ada Generation 4000 SFF Ada Generation 4500 Ada Generation 5000 Ada Generation 5880 Ada Generation 6000 Ada Generation 6000D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700 with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 5700
2019, $349
8 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
34.10
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
2023
20 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
49.46
+45%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms RX 5700 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RX 5700 RX 5700
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation29.64no data
Power efficiency14.6854.74
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 July 2019 (7 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23046144
Core clock speed1465 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate248.4299.5
Floating-point processing power7.949 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cache4 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length268 mm168 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB20 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.41.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5700 34.10
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 49.46
+45%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5700 14206
Samples: 3452
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20604
+45%
Samples: 245

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RX 5700 69603
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 124926
+79.5%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RX 5700 65201
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 110912
+70.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD114160−170
+40.4%
1440p69
−31%
100−110
4K4360−65
+39.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.06no data
1440p5.06no data
4K8.12no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 159 230−240
+44.7%
Counter-Strike 2 344 450−500
+30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 84 120−130
+42.9%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 131 190−200
+45%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 121 170−180
+40.5%
Battlefield 5 115 160−170
+39.1%
Counter-Strike 2 307 400−450
+30.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 75 100−105
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 156 220−230
+41%
Fortnite 166 240−250
+44.6%
Forza Horizon 4 132 190−200
+43.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 151 210−220
+39.1%
Valorant 294 400−450
+36.1%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 70 100−105
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 105 150−160
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 154 220−230
+42.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 400−450
+43.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 67 95−100
+41.8%
Dota 2 156 220−230
+41%
Far Cry 5 144 200−210
+38.9%
Fortnite 140 200−210
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 130 180−190
+38.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 137 190−200
+38.7%
Metro Exodus 87 120−130
+37.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 144 200−210
+38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147 210−220
+42.9%
Valorant 291 400−450
+37.5%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 97 140−150
+44.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 58 80−85
+37.9%
Dota 2 146 210−220
+43.8%
Far Cry 5 135 190−200
+40.7%
Forza Horizon 4 118 170−180
+44.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139 200−210
+43.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91 130−140
+42.9%
Valorant 160 230−240
+43.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 118 170−180
+44.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 87 120−130
+37.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 300−310
+24.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 72 100−105
+38.9%
Metro Exodus 51 70−75
+37.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 250−260
+42.9%
Valorant 277 400−450
+44.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 81 110−120
+35.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 36 50−55
+38.9%
Far Cry 5 93 130−140
+39.8%
Forza Horizon 4 103 140−150
+35.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 90−95
+42.9%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 77 110−120
+42.9%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 27−30 40−45
+42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 25 35−40
+40%
Grand Theft Auto V 72 100−105
+38.9%
Metro Exodus 31 40−45
+29%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48 65−70
+35.4%
Valorant 231 300−310
+29.9%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 54 75−80
+38.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 55−60
+41%
Cyberpunk 2077 15 21−24
+40%
Dota 2 100 140−150
+40%
Far Cry 5 47 65−70
+38.3%
Forza Horizon 4 70 100−105
+42.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 59 85−90
+44.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 39 55−60
+41%

This is how RX 5700 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 40% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 45% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 40% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 34.10 49.46
Recency 7 July 2019 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 45% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 29% more advanced lithography process, and 61% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
vs
Arc B570 Arc B570
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
vs
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
vs
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
RX 5700 AMD RX 5700
vs
Pro 5300 5300
RX 5700 5700
vs
RX 6950 XT 6950 XT
RTX 3050 OEM 3050 OEM
vs
RX 5700 5700
RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102
vs
RX 5700 5700
RX 5700 5700
vs
RX 7600S 7600S
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
vs
GRID RTX T10-4 RTX T10-4
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
vs
RTX PRO 1000 Blackwell Mobile 1000 Blackwell Mobile
T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1000 Max-Q
vs
Arc Graphics 140T 140T
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
RTX 4060 Ti 4060 Ti
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary 5700 XT 50th Anniversary

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 2432 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 60 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5700 or RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.