Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile vs Radeon RX 5700
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 164 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 61 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 35.59 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.45 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Navi 10 | TU102 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 7 July 2019 (6 years ago) | 4 September 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | 1465 MHz | 1275 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 10,300 million | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 248.4 | 419.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 7.949 TFLOPS | 13.41 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 |
| TMUs | 144 | 288 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 576 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 72 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 268 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
| G-SYNC support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 7 July 2019 | 4 September 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 200 Watt |
RX 5700 has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 11.1% lower power consumption.
RTX 6000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5700 and Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
