GMA X3000 vs Radeon RX 560X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking557not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.38no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code namePolaris 21Broadwater
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 April 2018 (8 years ago)1 June 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1175 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate81.604.000
Floating-point processing power2.611 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs648
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2018 1 June 2006
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 13 Watt

RX 560X has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X3000, on the other hand, has 477% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 560X and GMA X3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560X is a desktop graphics card while GMA X3000 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 456 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 32 votes

Rate GMA X3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 560X or GMA X3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.