GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a vs Radeon RX 560X Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking423not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.85no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePolaris 21C78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 April 2018 (6 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416
Core clock speed1275 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1202 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate81.604.000
Floating-point processing power2.611 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1450 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth92.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2018 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 40 Watt

RX 560X Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

8100 + nForce 720a, on the other hand, has 62.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 560X Mobile and GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 411 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 17 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.