Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP vs RX 560DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code namePolaris 21Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 April 2018 (7 years ago)18 September 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896128
Core clock speed1090 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1175 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate65.803.600
Floating-point processing power2.106 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs568
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2018 18 September 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

RX 560DX has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

HD 8280 Mobile IGP, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 560DX and Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560DX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560DX
Radeon RX 560DX
AMD Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 560DX or Radeon HD 8280 Mobile IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.