Tegra 2 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking187not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation42.65no data
Power efficiency16.46no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 10Tegra 2
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 January 2020 (5 years ago)3 June 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed1130 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate224.61.600
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1444
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2020 3 June 2010
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 20 Watt

RX 5600 XT has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra 2, on the other hand, has 650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5600 XT and Tegra 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop graphics card while Tegra 2 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIA Tegra 2
Tegra 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3354 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Tegra 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5600 XT or Tegra 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.