HD Graphics 32EU Mobile vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking189not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.82no data
Power efficiency16.47no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 10Bay Trail GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 January 2020 (6 years ago)2 September 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230432
Core clock speed1130 MHz311 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz646 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate224.62.584
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPS0.04134 TFLOPS
ROPs641
TMUs1444
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed14000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.131+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2020 2 September 2013
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 4 Watt

RX 5600 XT has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 214% more advanced lithography process.

HD Graphics 32EU Mobile, on the other hand, has 3650% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5600 XT and HD Graphics 32EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop graphics card while HD Graphics 32EU Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3554 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 7 votes

Rate HD Graphics 32EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5600 XT or HD Graphics 32EU Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.