GeForce 210 PCI vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking141not rated
Place by popularity77not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.77no data
Power efficiency16.30no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 10GT216
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 January 2020 (4 years ago)12 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed1130 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate224.63.800
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 January 2020 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 31 Watt

RX 5600 XT has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

210 PCI, on the other hand, has 383.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5600 XT and GeForce 210 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
GeForce 210 PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2692 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 77 votes

Rate GeForce 210 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.