Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Radeon RX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

RX 560
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.45

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms RX 560 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking435292
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.54no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe LPG
GPU code namePolaris 21Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 no data
Current price$381 (3.8x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10247
Core clock speed1175 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1275 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate81.60no data
Floating-point performance2,611 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 560 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+2.9%
34
−2.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−90%
55−60
+90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−111%
38
+111%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−95.8%
45−50
+95.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−103%
80−85
+103%
Hitman 3 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−97.1%
65−70
+97.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−100%
45−50
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−86.7%
55−60
+86.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−100%
50−55
+100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−90%
55−60
+90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−88.9%
34
+88.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−95.8%
45−50
+95.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−103%
80−85
+103%
Hitman 3 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−97.1%
65−70
+97.1%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−93.3%
55−60
+93.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−100%
45−50
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−86.7%
55−60
+86.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−92.6%
52
+92.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−100%
50−55
+100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−90%
55−60
+90%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−94.4%
35
+94.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−95.8%
45−50
+95.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−103%
80−85
+103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−120%
22
+120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−100%
50−55
+100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Hitman 3 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−88.9%
30−35
+88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Hitman 3 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−90%
18−20
+90%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Battlefield 5 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

This is how RX 560 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • RX 560 is 3% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.45 17.43
Recency 18 April 2017 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560 is a desktop card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2576 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.