Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Radeon RX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 560 Radeon RX 560 896SP Radeon RX 560D Radeon RX 560DX Radeon RX 560X
VS
Arc 7-Core iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 8-Core iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 560 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

RX 560
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.48

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms RX 560 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RX 560 RX 560
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking477328
Place by popularity78not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.48no data
Power efficiency8.68no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code namePolaris 21Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10247
Core clock speed1175 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1275 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate81.60no data
Floating-point processing power2.611 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+2.9%
34
−2.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 41
+0%
41
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 32
+0%
32
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 23
+0%
23
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 23
+0%
23
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 52
+0%
52
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Far Cry 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how RX 560 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • RX 560 is 3% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 56 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.48 17.21
Recency 18 April 2017 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 81.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560 is a desktop card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 560
Radeon RX 560
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RX 560 Radeon RX 560
vs
HD 7850 Radeon HD 7850
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Arc 7 Cores iGPU
vs
GTX 965M SLI GeForce GTX 965M SLI
RX 560 Radeon RX 560
vs
GTX 750 Ti GeForce GTX 750 Ti
R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
RTX 3090 RTX 3090
RX 460 1024SP Radeon RX 460 1024SP
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
vs
HD 8950M HD 8950M
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4200-8X Ti 4200-8X
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
vs
HD 8550G HD 8550G
RX 560 Radeon RX 560
vs
GT 720M GT 720M
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RX 540 Radeon RX 540
vs
GTX 960 OEM GTX 960 OEM
RX 540 Radeon RX 540
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 Plus Graphics 650
Pro WX 4130 Radeon Pro WX 4130
vs
GTX 650 GTX 650

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 2944 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 57 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 560 or Arc 7-Cores iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.