GeForce G110M vs Radeon RX 560 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking481not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.67no data
Power efficiency12.24no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBaffinG96C
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2017 (9 years ago)8 January 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416
Core clock speed1175 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1275 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate76.933.200
Floating-point processing power2.462 TFLOPS0.032 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data48
ROPs164
TMUs648
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentDisplayPortDual Link DVIVGAHDMISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2017 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 14 Watt

RX 560 Mobile has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G110M, on the other hand, has 364% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 560 Mobile and GeForce G110M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 56 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate GeForce G110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 560 Mobile or GeForce G110M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.