T400 4 GB vs Radeon RX 560 XT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated457
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.69
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameEllesmereTU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2019 (5 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792384
Core clock speed973 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed1073 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate120.234.20
Floating-point processing power3.846 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs11224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort3x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2019 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 30 Watt

T400 4 GB has an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 560 XT and T400 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560 XT is a desktop card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560 XT
Radeon RX 560 XT
NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 198 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 57 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.