RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 560 896SP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated27
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.34
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePolaris 21AD103
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 July 2017 (8 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8967680
Core clock speed1090 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speed1175 MHz2580 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate65.80619.2
Floating-point processing power2.106 TFLOPS39.63 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs56240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cache224 KB7.5 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length170 mm245 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 July 2017 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 210 Watt

RX 560 896SP has 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 560 896SP and RTX 4500 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 560 896SP is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4500 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
Radeon RX 560 896SP
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 896SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 26 votes

Rate RTX 4500 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 560 896SP or RTX 4500 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.