ATI Radeon 7000 vs RX 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2541551
Place by popularity79not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation43.01no data
Power efficiency12.41no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameNavi 14RV100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 December 2019 (5 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speed1607 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate162.40.55
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs883

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8AGP 4x
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s2.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5500 XT 9104
+455100%
ATI 7000 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD76no data
1440p42no data
4K24no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.22no data
1440p4.02no data
4K7.04no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 254 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 78 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 72 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 74 no data
Counter-Strike 2 196 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 61 no data
Far Cry 5 105 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 78 no data
Forza Horizon 5 109 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 56 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 71 no data
Counter-Strike 2 98 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45 no data
Dota 2 149 no data
Far Cry 5 96 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 66 no data
Forza Horizon 5 94 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 94 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 42 no data
Metro Exodus 52 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40 no data
Dota 2 143 no data
Far Cry 5 89 no data
Forza Horizon 4 56 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 31 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58 no data
Valorant 114 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 44 no data
Metro Exodus 31 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20 no data
Far Cry 5 60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 41 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 23 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 42 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 19 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31 no data
Valorant 120−130 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8 no data
Dota 2 78 no data
Far Cry 5 30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 12 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2019 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 23 Watt

RX 5500 XT has an age advantage of 18 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 465.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3082 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 196 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5500 XT or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.