Jetson T4000 vs Radeon RX 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking616not rated
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.92no data
Power efficiency9.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameLexaGB10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date20 April 2017 (8 years ago)27 August 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121536
Core clock speed1100 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1183 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate37.86161.6
Floating-point processing power1.211 TFLOPS7.757 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3264
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cache128 KB3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Length145 mm243 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1067 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s273.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2017 27 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt

Jetson T4000 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 550 and Jetson T4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550 is a desktop graphics card while Jetson T4000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550
Radeon RX 550
NVIDIA Jetson T4000
Jetson T4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 7855 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson T4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 550 or Jetson T4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.