Arc Graphics 64EU vs Radeon RX 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking627not rated
Place by popularity33not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.92no data
Power efficiency10.02no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe2-LPG (2024)
GPU code nameLexaArrow Lake
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date20 April 2017 (9 years ago)24 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Core clock speed1100 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1183 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million17,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate37.8660.80
Floating-point processing power1.211 TFLOPS1.946 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8Ring Bus
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2017 24 October 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

RX 550 has 30% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 64EU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 550 and Arc Graphics 64EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8365 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 4 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 550 or Arc Graphics 64EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.