Radeon RX Vega Mobile vs RX 540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking539not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 12Vega Mobile
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date21 March 2017 (7 years ago)7 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121792
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate39.01no data
Floating-point performance1.248 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.012_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2017 7 January 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 90 Watt

RX 540 has 20% lower power consumption.

RX Vega Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 540 and Radeon RX Vega Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 540
Radeon RX 540
AMD Radeon RX Vega Mobile
Radeon RX Vega Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 154 votes

Rate Radeon RX 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 290 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.