Radeon R7 350 OEM vs RX 540

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking536not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.00no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameLexaOland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 November 2017 (6 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
Core clock speed1124 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate39.0125.20
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2017 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

RX 540 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 540 and Radeon R7 350 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 540 is a notebook card while Radeon R7 350 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 540
Radeon RX 540
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM
Radeon R7 350 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 157 votes

Rate Radeon RX 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 37 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.