Matrox Parhelia 128 MB vs Radeon RX 540

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking542not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.93no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameLexaParhelia-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 November 2017 (7 years ago)25 June 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed1124 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,200 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate39.010.8
Floating-point processing power1.248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 4x
Lengthno data175 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2017 25 June 2002
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

RX 540 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 540 and Matrox Parhelia 128 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 540 is a notebook card while Matrox Parhelia 128 MB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 540
Radeon RX 540
Matrox Parhelia 128 MB
Parhelia 128 MB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 157 votes

Rate Radeon RX 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 128 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.