Radeon Pro 575 vs RX 5300
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 281 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.38 | no data |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Navi 14 | Polaris 20 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 5 June 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1408 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1327 MHz | 1096 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 6,400 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 144.8 | 140.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.632 TFLOPS | 4.489 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88 | 128 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 180 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.0 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 28 May 2020 | 5 June 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 120 Watt |
RX 5300 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.
Pro 575, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5300 and Radeon Pro 575. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 5300 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
