T400 4 GB vs Radeon RX 5300 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated518
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.27
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14TU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 October 2019 (6 years ago)6 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024384
Core clock speed1670 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate118.134.20
Floating-point processing power3.779 TFLOPS1.094 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6424
L1 Cacheno data384 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort3x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2019 6 May 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 30 Watt

RX 5300 XT has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T400 4 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5300 XT and T400 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5300 XT is a desktop graphics card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
Radeon RX 5300 XT
NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 23 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 86 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5300 XT or T400 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.