GeForce 9200M vs Radeon RX 5300 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.16
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNavi 14C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 May 2020 (5 years ago)15 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816
Core clock speed1375 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,400 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate78.963.600
Floating-point processing power2.527 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width96 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth84 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2020 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 7 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 12 Watt

RX 5300 OEM has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has 1025% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 5300 OEM and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5300 OEM is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9200M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5300 OEM
Radeon RX 5300 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5300 OEM or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.